Every team has to make various decisions before, and during, the development of a digital product. One of these usually involves yarn
, npm
or another tool to build and package javascript code. Some developers have a burning desire to go in a certain direction, and sometimes they end up spending a considerable amount of time trying to make decisions that in fact will have little impact in their everyday life.
To understand why this is an interesting decision to make in the first place, we need to have a look at the history of package management in javascript.
- Pre
npm
: frontend dependencies are downloaded manually and stored into the repositories 📁 - 2010:
npm
is released and supports nodejs
📦 - 2012:
npm
usage is dramatically increasing - primarily due to Browserifys
browser support 🎉 - 2012:
npm
get a competitor, bower
, that entirely supports browsers 💻 - 2012-2016: The number of dependencies for frontend projects increases exponentially 🤯
- 2012-2016: Building and installing frontend applications becomes slower and slower 🐢
- 2012-2016: An infinite amount of (duplicated) dependencies are stored in nested folders within the magic
node_modules
☢️ - 2012-2016:
rm -rf node_modules
the most frequently used command as a frontend developer..? 🗑 - 2015:
bower
lose the battle against npm
💀 - 2015:
node_modules
are changed to a (more) flatten file structure! 🕸 - 2016:
left-pad
becomes the worldwide news of the day 👈 - 2016:
yarn
is released 🚀- Supports both
npm
and bower
repositories yarn.lock
locks installed versions and provide deterministic dependencies. No more rm -rf node_modules
!yarn install
spend about half the time versus npm install
(without using cache)- Caching and offline mode enables build processes to consume nearly no time
- Supports both
- 2016:
npm
releases shrinkwrap
🧯- An attempt to handle dependency locking
- Unfortunately, several errors and promising more than it could manage - the reputation of the tool became poor
- 2017:
npm
5 is released 🔓package-lock.json
is their new tool, shrinkwrap
is put asidepackage-lock.json
take on the fight against yarns
lock file
- 2018:
npm ci
is released 🛬- Build code using
package-lock.json
directly - No expensive security and version analyses on the dependencies
- Build time is drastically reduced on the build server!
- Build code using
- 2018:
npm
6 is released 👮♀️npm
check security vulnerabilities for dependencies to be installed- No significant variance in build time between
yarn
and npm
- 2019:
tink
is in beta mode 🦋- Avoid using
node_modules
and rather have one file with hashes for each dependency in the project - Not yet production-ready
- Avoid using
- ...
Phew 🥵
As we can see, after the release of yarn
, npm
has been inspired (and forced?) to develop lots of good tools and mechanisms. yarn
should get credit for addressing some important problems related to npm
and put pressure on their competitor back in 2016. Both speed, security and deterministic package handling are essential features that allow today's developers to focus and concentrate on creating value - and not fighting the tool.
Conclusion 🤔
For convenience, I would recommend most teams (who have to make numerous other and more important technologically decisions) to choose the easiest option - npm
. It is shipped with node
and is, in 2019, sufficient enough to handle package management in a good manner.
Always an exception? 🧐
When using monorepo, yarn workspaces
is a popular alternative whereas npm
doesn't offer an equivalent alternative. lerna
is a package that also supports usage of monorepos and works with both npm
and yarn
(with workspaces
)
pnpm 🥉
PS: It should be mentioned that pnpm
is the third option for package management. pnpm's
selling point is not downloading a package if it is already downloaded in another repository - which is similar to dependency management in Java, maven
. At the time of writing, pnpm
is not as mature and production-ready as yarn
or npm
Relevant resources recommended by the author
Woops. An error has occured, and we are not able to find the link!
Woops. An error has occured, and we are not able to find the link!